|
Whether short or tall, portly or slim, a man needs to shop for his clothing
with his individual physique in mind.
Since most people aspire to look like some idealized version of themselves,
selecting clothes based on a particular body type is as old as fashion itself.
Whereas I believe that familiarity with the geometric principles that
downplay girth or emphasize height or breadth is helpful, such information
should be viewed as a guide rather than dogma.
I have seen the most well-dressed men wear clothes in stark contradiction to
the accepted dictates of fashionable physiognomy.
I can recall one portly, older gentleman looking so debonair in his large,
plaid, hefty tweed sports suit simply because it was cut to perfection.
I am told that no other group of men would parade down Savile Row in the
thirties with more panache than the contingent of Brazilian diplomats, most of
whom were under five feet seven and all of whom wore their soft-shoulder,
double-breasted suits with cuffed trousers.
Proportion in dress in the foundation of all classic dressing. The truly
stylish man knows enough about the rules to know how and when to break them.
To assist some of the basic body types in choosing their tailored clothing, I
would like to make the following suggestions:
THE DRESS SHIRT
THE DRESS SHIRT COLLAR
When purchasing a dress shirt that is, one intended to be worn with a necktie
- consider its collar first.
Regardless of whether the shirt appears to go perfectly with your new suits,
or is meticulously crafted with vast numbers of stitches to the inch, or even
woven in the Caribbean's most lustrous sea island cotton, if its high-banded
collar looks at if it might swallow up your neck or its diminutive collar make
your already prominent chin appear more so, move on.
You need to focus on that portion of the dress shirt responsible for
exhibiting to best advantage the body part that should receive the most
attention - your face.
The triangle formed by the V opening of a buttoned tailored jacket and
extending up to the area just below a persons chin is the cynosure of a man's
costume.
There are several dynamics working simultaneously to directly under the face,
the wearer's most expressive body part. Second, the area is usually accentuated
by contrasts between the darker jacket and lighter shirt, the jacket and tie,
and the tie and dress shirt.
This triangular sector offer, the wearer's most expressive body part. Second,
the area is usually accentuated by contrasts between the darker jacket and
lighter shirt, the jacket and tie, and the tie and dress shirt.
This triangular sector offers more visible layers of textural activity than
any other part of a mans outfit, and the point at which all these elements
converge is directly under ones chin, where the inverted V of the dress shirt
collar comes to a point.
Think of your face as portrait and your shirt collar as its frame.
The collars height on your neck as well as the length and spread of its
points should compliment the shape and size of your face.
Within the infinite permutations of angle, scale, and mass, no single article
of apparel better enhances a mans countenance than the well-designed dress
shirt collar.
Since a persons bone structure is fixed, although it will be affected by a
weight gain or loss, the choice of collar should be guided by the individuals
particular physical requirements rather than the vicissitudes of fashion.
Unlike other less visible accoutrements such as hosiery or shirt cuffs, this
focal point constitutes one of a mans most revealing gestures of personal
style.
All sophisticated dressers have arrives at one or more collar styles that
best highlight their unique features while managing to add a bit of dash along
the way.
Choosing the appropriate shirt collar requires experimentation and common
sense.
A smallish man with delicate features would be lost in a high-set collar with
points longer than 3. Conversely, a heavyset or big-boned man would loom even
larger and overshadow a small collar.
Collars should counterbalance the facial structure by either softening its
strong lines or strengthening its soft ones.
Long straight point collars - those 3 or more - will extend and narrow a
wide face just as the broad-spaced points of spread collars will offset the line
of long narrow one.
Tab collars or other pinned collars have the necessary height to shorten long
necks.
Strong-chinned men require fuller proportioned collars, just as large
tabletops clamor for ample pedestals to achieve aesthetic balance.
Though, admittedly, button-downs can look casually stylish, they are too
often favored by exactly the kind of men who should avoid them - the double
chinned set.
Softer-chinned men need slightly higher and firmer collars to compensate for
the lack of a strong line under their face.
Throughout the eighties and up through the mid-nineties, most dress shirts-no
matter how expensive-generally had collars that were to small for the average
wearer's face.
In an effort to convey that were too small for the average wearer's face.
In an effort t convey a more casual and less structured formality, mens
fashion has explored many approaches to neutralizing the collars conventional
starched and ordered format. Consequently, collars have been lowered, shortened,
and softened to such degrees that the original precepts for their correct
proportioning have either been distorted or lost completely.
Button-downs have little or on roll, straight point collars are so short even
the smallest tie knot prevents their point from touching the shirt?s chest,
while speared collars are so low on the neck they have been sapped of all their
strength and flair.
Except for those produced by a few high-end American, English, or Italian
shirt makers, most dress shirt give the impression they are apologizing for
their collars.
The explosive growth of the made-to-measure dress shirt business owes much of
its prosperity to the dramatize a mans features.
By the end of this decade, there will be more properly scaled collars on
dress shirts than there were at its commencement.
I cannot help but wonder whether the long-understood sartorial contract
between a man and the conventional format of a buttoned-up dress shirt and
drawn-up necktie - which, in effect, exchanged superior stature for a measure of
restriction - is no longer able to be negotiated.
Since many of the contemporary, more diminutive collar styles fail to
heighten the wearers appearance, they offer little compensation for their
inherent discomfort. As a result, many alternatives have been put forth in an
effort to replace the classic dress shirt collar composition.
However, as Oscar Schoeffler, longtime fashion editor of Esquire, once
warned, Never underestimate the power of what you wear.
After all, there is just a small bit of you sticking out at the collar and
cuff.
The rest of what the world sees is what you drape on your frame.
Therefore, the most important factor to weigh when buying a dress shirt is not
its color, fit, or price. It is the collar and its smartness for the wearer?s
face.
FIT
Other than the Italians, who are almost fetishistically meticulous about the
fit of their dress shirts, most men wear theirs too short in the sleeve, too
small in the collar, and too full around the wrist.
The explanation for this is relatively straightforward: successive washings
shrink collar size and sleeve length, while most shirting manufacturers allow
enough breadth in a mans cuff to accommodate a large wrist girded by a
Rolex-type watch.
The best dress shirt is useless if its collar does not fit comfortably.
With the top button closed, you should be able to slide two-dress shirt.
Most better dress shirt makers add an extra to the stated collar size to
allow for shrinkage within the first several washings.
I would never wear a new dress shirt unless it fits perfectly around the neck
in the store or when first tried on at home, return it or risk being strangled
by a smaller collar before too very long.
The back of the shirt collar should be high enough to show ?? above the rear
portion of the jackets collar.
Its points should be able to touch the shirts body and rest smoothly on its
front. When a tie is fitted up into the collar, its points should be long enough
to remain in contact with the shirts body, regardless of how sharply the wearer
turns his head.
No part of the collars band should be able to be seen peeking over the ties
knot.
Semi spread to cutaway collars should have no tie space above the ties knot.
In other words, both sides of the collars inverted V should meet or touch
each other while the edges of their point should be covered both jackets neck.
DRESSING THE HAND
The band of linen between coat sleeve and hand is another one of those
stylistic gestures associated with the better-dressed man.
It has been so ever since the first aristocrat wore his lace ruffles spilled
out from beneath his jacket cuffs.
Some fashion historian mark the decline in modern mens style from the point
at which ready-made buttoned cuffs replaced cuff-linked ones and men found their
wrists swathed in excess fabric, which either fell down their wrists or pulled
up too short.
Whether you choose a button cuff or a French cuff, the shirt cuff should fit
snugly around the wrist so that the additional length required to keep it from
moving as the arm stretches does not fall down over the hand.
If you can slide your hand though the cuff opening without first unfastening
it, it is too large.
If the sleeve is long enough and the cuff fits correctly, you should be able
to move your arm in any direction without influencing how the cuff sits on top
of your hand.
The shirt cuff and hand should be able to move as a unit.
THE BODY
During the 1960s peacock era, when dress shirts had the fit of a second skin
and were worn to flaunt the chest and arm muscles, the wearer had to pay
particular attention to gaping shirtfronts if he inhaled too deeply or Sat down.
Today, with comfort driving the fit of mens clothes, issues such as these
are no longer of much concern.
The shirt should certainly be full enough to allow its wearer to sit without
concern.
Normal shrinkage or a slight weight gain should not render it uncomfortable
across the chest or waist.
Since shirts with blousier fits tend to have lower arm holes, one should pay
attention that the jackets armhole does not pull up the shirtsleeve, making it
too short to rest on the top of the hand.
A shirts armhole should fit comfortably up into the armpit for easier
movement and consistent length.
The shirts overall length should be such that you can raise your arms
without pulling the garment out of the trouser top.
IN CONSIDERATION OF QUALITY
The most expensive component of any dress shirt is its fabric.
As the layer in closest contact with the wearers skin, the most comfortable
and luxurious fiber to wear is unquestionably 100 percent cotton.
Anyone doubting this need only examine the fiber content of almost all mens
undergarments.
Better dress shirts are made in two-ply cotton or two-fold yarns, less
expensive ones in single-ply. Cotton-poly blends are never two-ply, therefore
these fabric tend to be found only in cheaper shirts.
In a true two-ply fabric, the yarns used in the vertical warp and horizontal
weft are made from two fibers long enough to twist around each other to produce
the incremental strength, silk ness, and luster associated with the two-fold
luxury fabric.
The finer the yarn, the higher its threads per-inch count. Two-ply fabrics
start at 80/2 (the 2 representing two-ply) and progress to as fine as 220/2
(which feels more like silk than cotton and is so expensive it is use only in
custom-made shirts).
Since two-ply dress shirt are costlier, most manufacturers will include this
designation on the label. If it is not so designated, it usually means the shirt
is of a single-ply fabric and its cost should reflect this.
Most two-ply dress shirts begin retailing at $75 for those privately labeled
in large department stores and go to well over $200 for those more highly
crafted with finer-count two-ply fabrics.
Most two-ply dress shirts begin retailing at $75 for those privately labeled
in large department stores and go to well over $200 for those more highly
crafted with finer-count two-ply fabrics.
Since we know how a poorly designed collar can scuttle the most expensive
dress shirt, the two-ply designation reflects a garments intrinsic quality and
not its relative value.
The better dress shirt is one of the few products whose craft has been
relatively uncompromised by modern manufacturing technology.
Due to the many pieces that must be put together and the exacting sewing
procedures required, there is no substitute for the skilled, highly trained
labor needed to produce a fine dress shirt.
As it is not covered over by linings and such, a dress shirts construction,
with the exception of collar and cuff, can be more easily evaluated than that of
tailored clothing or neckties.
All of its stitching, seams, and finishing are plainly exposed to the
inquiring eye, especially if one knows what to look for and why.
There can be some details of workmanship that, should even one be found
present, signal your investigation is at an end and the shirts dearer price has
been confirmed.
Most of these benchmarks are holdovers from a less mechanized age when the
standards for deluxe quality were set by bespoke shirt makers.
No manufacturer would willingly invest in the labor required to make such a
shirt without ensuring the fabric was of a quality that justified the products
retail price.
He would be hard-pressed to recoup the cost of such craftsmanship if it was
wasted on a shirt composed of inferior cloth.
The handmade buttonhole is a detail rarely found in shirt made outside of
France or Italy.
If you have a shirt with handmade buttonholes it represents a piece of
workmanship that literally comes from the old country.
Now, some custom shirt makers will argue in favor of a fine machine-made
buttonhole over a handmade one, but handmade buttonholes are a mark of
top-drawer threads. Ironically, their imperfect and visible portion can only
identify them.
As with legitimate custom tailored clothes, buttonholes are to be handmade,
nothing less.
When dress shirts were worn closely fitted to the torso, their side seams
were much in evidence and their width and finishing were considered two of the
most important criteria for judging their shirt making craft.
I can recall visiting Italy during the sixties and observing the Romans
wrapped in their skintight, darted blue voile shirt with side seams that seemed
to disappear into minute lines that traced the body.
These side seams were of a single-needle construction. If the shirt you are
considering has this feather, you are no doubt holding a garment that will
command a better price.
Single-needle side seams are sewn twice, once up and once down the shirts
seam, using only one needle and leaving just a single row of stitches visible on
the outside.
This is time-consuming and requires greater skill on the part of the operator
than other seams. Most shirts side seams are sewn on a double-needle machine,
which is much faster and produces two rows of visible stitching.
Unfortunately, the double-needle side seam can, depending on the quality of
its execution, pucker over time due to the thread and fabrics different
reactions to washing.
However, since most modern shoppers are not that informed, the single-needle
side seam is rarely found on ready-made shirts, and is almost exclusively
reserved for those dress shirts found in the world of the bespoke.
Another telltale sign of an expensively made dress shirt can be found in the
bottom tails design and finishing.
Charvet, the famed French chemisier, designs its shirts with a square bottom
and side slits or vents, which they feel produce less bulk under the trouser.
They also believe their deeper sides keep the shirt better anchored.
Turnbull and Asser, the Jermyn Street shirt maker, prefers the rounded bottom
but reinforces its side seam at the bottom with a small triangular gusset.
Either of these designs demands greater labor and expertise than the typical
hemmed bottom.
Prior to World War II, the gusset was a common feature on better shirts, but
production costs forced many manufacturers to abandon this old-fashioned
finishing technique.
The next nuance of detail that signals a dress shirts loftier pedigree is
the direction of its sleeve plackets buttonhole.
All better shirts come with a small placket button and buttonhole to close
the opening running up the inside sleeve from its cuff.
However, a horizontally sewn buttonhole is evidence of meticulous crafting,
since the button must be lined up perfectly with the buttonhole, unlike a
vertical placement, which allows a greater margin for error.
Since this detail is easily detectable, it can make any examination a short
one.
The last sure giveaway of rarefied shirt making can only be detected in a
shirt made of a striped fabric.
Should the stripe of its sleeve line up exactly with the horizontal line of
the yoke?s stripe when they meet at the shoulder seams, you are in the presence
of shirt making art.
Generally, this kind of work is reserved for the custom-made dress shirt, but
should you find it in one ready-made, be prepared to pay at least $150.
The next passel of workmanship details should be present on all deluxe-priced
($125 and up) dress shirts whether they are representing themselves as better
ready-to-wear, made-to-measure, or even custom-made.
While it is more difficult for the beginner to identify these details once
learned, less well-made dress shirts become much easier to spot.
The stitching on a shirts collar and cuffs should be so fine as to be nearly
invisible.
If you can clearly see each individual stitch sitting on top pf the fabric,
its manufacturer is less costly.
All better dress shirt collars have removable stays.
The shape or pattern on either side of a shirt?s collar parts or cuffs should
match exactly.
Pockets should be lined up so that they virtually vanish from sight.
Buttonholes should be finished so that it is difficult to see their
individual stitches.
Buttons should be cross-stitched for extra strength, an operation that cannot
be performed by machine.
Real pearl buttons are to fine shirt what authentic horn buttons are to
expensive sports jackets.
If a sewing machine needle hits a plastic button, the button shatters; should
that same needle strike a pearl button, the needle shatters.
Authentic mother-of-pearl buttons, especially thicker ones, are incredibly
sensual to the hand and eye, as well as costing ten times the price of the
typical plastic button.
DRESS SHIRT AESTHETICS
While the dress shirt functions as a backdrop for necktie, braces, jacket,
and pocket square, there are two options in furnishing this stage.
The first and by far the more popularly practiced method employ the dress
shirt as a neutral foundation.
As such, the elements are either harmonized upon it or one is emphasized over
the others, such as the bold print tie against a solid white shirt.
In this presentation, the shirt acts purely in a supporting role.
The alternative approach casts the dress shirt as leading man at center
stage.
This style emanated from England and is reasonably easy to execute if the
principles governing its execution are well understood.
In socially conscious London, an upper-class man would signal his membership
in a particular club, regiment, or school through his choice of tie.
Since these neckties designs were fairly standard and limited in number
(there being, after all, only so many organizations the wearer could claim as
his own), he tended to punctuate his somber and predictable business ensembles
with more strongly patterned dress shirt, the very lesson Londons Jermyn Street
became so renowned for gentlemens dress shirts.
In this approach, the tie, shirt, and pocket square act as subordinate
players to the shirt.
A well-endowed collar was essential to convey the shirts leading role and
the wearers loftier station, which is why English-bred dress shirt tend to have
more prominent collars than their European or American counterparts
As either of these approaches can project considerable sophistication, one
last issue remains in guiding a man toward an informed dress shirt purchase.
This concerns the stylistic consistency of the shirts parts.
For example, regardless of how beautiful its fabric or fit, a double-breasted
jacket with a center vent remains a half-breed, a mixed metaphor, a sartorial
mutt.
A garments detailing must be in character with its fabric, or else, like a
pinstriped suit with patch pockets or flap pockets on a tuxedo, the wearables
integrity and classiness is compromised
Here are some general guidelines specific to the styling of men?s dress
shirts:
The smoother and more lustrous the fabric, the dressier the shirt.
On the scale of relative formality, blue broadcloth ranks above blue
end-on-end broadcloth which, in turn, ranks above blue pinpoint oxford, which in
finer and dressier than regular blue oxford.
But royal or queens oxford, which is made of a two-ply yarn that gives the
oxford weave greater sheen and a finer texture, is comparable to end-on-end
broadcloth in its formality.
The more white that shows in the ground of a check or stripe, the dressier
the shirting.
Different collar styles also connote varying degrees of dress-up.
Spread collars are generally dressier than straight point collar and become
even more so with each degree of openness.
White contrast collars dress up any shirt no matter its pattern or color, and
should only be worn with a French cuff in either self fabric or contrasting
white.
However, a straight point contrast collar in white is as much a sartorial
oxymoron as button cuffs on a dress shirt with is as much a sartorial oxymoron
as button buffs on a dress shirt look less authentically classy in collar models
less open than a semi-spread, because their to-attach stiff progenitors could
only accommodate a four-in-hand if there was enough width to the collar opening.
Tab, pinned, or eyelet collars can also give a fabric a more decorous look.
If you see a blue oxford shirt decorated with a white spread collar or a
button-down collar loitering on a dressy white ground English striping, avoid
these mongrel offerings, for their questionable propriety will do nothing for
yours.
Most of the criteria for purchasing a classically styled dress shirt have
little to do with price or even the quality of the fabric.
If a relatively shirt made with a mediocre fabric has a collar that is
flattering to your face and affords you the right fit, it will render greater
value to you than a more expensively made shirt with neither of these
attributes.
Value has to do with longevity of wear, as ultimately, the most expensive
clothes a man can buy are those that rarely come out of the closet
Email info@embassyfashion.com
or kevin@embassyfashion.com for more
information and or confirmation of offer
acceptance.
|